Weeks → days
Diagnosis time compressed from weeks to days. Analyst prep time cut 50%. Engagement duration: 6 months → 6 weeks.
Consulting Partners
Your team spends 80% of an engagement on a diagnosis that misses the real cause.
3-Cubed runs alongside your methodology. It finds what the process walk doesn't.
And it gives your business case numbers your delivery team can defend six months after the engagement closes.
THE CHALLENGE
The pattern repeats across engagements.
Process walks surface symptoms, not causes. The business case rests on assumptions that delivery can't defend six months later. The result: eroded client trust, scope creep, and a recommendation that was technically correct in isolation but wrong in context.
Where It Shows Up
- Root cause inferred from interviews — not computed from the system
- Business case numbers that delivery inherits but can't validate
- Recommendations that optimise one lever and degrade three others
- Six-month engagements where the first three months are diagnostic.
How 3-Cubed Addresses It
Diagnosis in days. A business case your delivery team can defend.
Computed root cause
Surfaces what process walks miss: control misplacement, shift misalignment, deadline-driven rework — computed, not inferred.
Quantified future state
Outcomes modelled before you propose. Cost, cycle time, and control consequences per option — not estimated.
Defensible business case
Numbers the delivery team can validate against. Client trust maintained six months after the engagement closes.
Consulting Partners — Computed Outputs
3-Cubed Outcomes,
Before Commitment
Each Metric Computed Across The Full PROFIT Lever Interaction. Each Tile Shows Which Levers Drove The Outcome.
Cost
4.2%
Cost Base Reduction
Required FTE59 FTE
Infra Cost−22%
· Unit Economics · Investor Lens
Driven By
- Operations88%
- IT68%
- Finance52%
Client Experience
13.2 DAYS
Cycle Time Reduction
First-time Right64%
Critical Path7.2 days
· Experience & Trust · Client Lens
Driven By
- Operations85%
- Process72%
- IT58%
Control
80%
Control Coverage
Lines of Defence3 LOD
Control Efficacy77.5%
· Risk & Compliance · Regulator Lens
Driven By
- Risk94%
- IT60%
- Process48%
Case Evidence
In every case: the model found what the team didn't expect.
See case dataBanking: KYC / Compliance
Reduce cycle time and cost
- Cost
- −40%
- Cycle
- −31%
- Control
- +4 pp
Oil & Gas: Accounts Payable
Reduce cost, maintain controls
- Cost
- −49%
- Cycle
- —
- Control
- —
Healthcare: Claims
Reduce effort and cycle time
- Cost
- −27%
- Cycle
- −57%
- Control
- +10 pp
Trade Finance: Letters of Credit
Reduce cost and TAT
- Cost
- −9%
- Cycle
- −63%
- Control
- +7 pp
All cases anonymised by industry. Client names available under NDA.
−50%
Analyst prep time
−60%
Engagement duration
Modelled
Business case — not estimated
See what happens before you decide.
Book a Demo